Of Pandas, Penguins, and other Animals

Goodbye, link farms, mass submissions, Grade 6-style writing, and trashy link exchanges.

For years, many (many!) websites had ranked well and had great SERPs because they had perfected keyword-spamming and mass link exchanges. (That’s a bit of a simplification, but not by much). All this was, of course, violating some important Google  rules and guidelines, but what the heck:  today is today, and tomorrow never comes. So those “bad guys” lived well for a long time.  Or shall we say, on borrowed time. To be sure, many websites were totally White Hat and had nothing to fear.

But tomorrow did come. Rumor had it for months that Matt Cutts and the other boys from Google were planning to clamp down on websites that had been, ah, non-compliant with Big Brother’s wishes. And clamp down they did, as we all know by now. So they unleashed on us Panda and Penguin which is ironic, because those are cute animals.

The borders and exact timing of Operations Panda and Penguin are a bit blurry. They even overlapped partly, but it doesn’t matter.  Between February and early May, hundreds of thousands, probably millions of, ah, non-compliant websites got hit by the new Google algorithms, and as a consequence lost search result rankings, often dozens or hundreds of positions. Many of them slid into oblivion.

To quote an SEO specialist (Ernie Schwarcz), Panda and Penguin were the “Internet equivalent of a massive, internationally coordinated police raid, or a surprise missile strike”.  But this is no joking matter. These were some very sad and strenuous weeks for the web community.

So, what kind of SEO behavior did Google frown upon?  Of course, nobody will ever know for sure. Google keeps its algorithms close to the chest. But the consensus among SEO experts seems to be as follows:

a)  Irrelevant and / or bad quality backlinks
b)  Backlinks from link farms
c)  Paid backlinks
d)  Too many identical text (anchor) backlinks, which would suggest “unnatural linking”
e)  Doorway pages
f)  Keyword spamming
g)  Unnatural or irrelevant page content just for the sake of keyword accumulation
h)  Failure to deliver interesting and fresh content

There are almost certainly other issues as well, but the above probably covers over 90% of the territory.

Enough food for thought, I would have thought.

As a result of their police action, Google is perceived to be a trifle less glamorous now than a few months ago; no longer like a friendly grandpa but, say,  like a strict, perfectionist father. They come across as heavy-handed, and as judge and executioner in one; with many webmasters, they are about as popular right now as a Rabbi at a KKK meeting.

I am not reaping any benefits from Google for saying this, but it must be said they are not out to destroy the existing web community, but to build a “better” one (whatever this means). Alas, by bulldozing its path to improvement, Big Brother has left behind massive collateral damage. And the game isn’t over yet; even more changes are likely.

But, like it or not, Google calls the shots, and SEO consultants and other SEO people will have to play ball.

So what does Google want to achieve with letting loose Pandas and Penguins and later maybe Panthers, Pelicans, Parrots, Pigeons or Pigs ?  (Full disclosure:  2 out of these 5 P’s I had to google).

Well, in short, they want to create and foster a culture of websites which are informative, relevant, well written, naturally structured, and that aim to be genuinely liked by websites with similar themes, or by people on social networks .  Even shorter: sites that will give their visitors useful, up-to-date, well presented, easy to use and well respected content.

Phew.  Did I leave anything out?  Anyone out there?

Message to Matt Cutts:  Matt, if you read this, let us know when you’ll P next.

Dear Readers, I hope your site(s) didn’t get hit. Kudos to all those who were in compliance. But what to do if you did because you weren’t?

That’ll be the topic of the next article.  Stay put. And after this heavy topic, you may now visit the Chill Out page to relax.  And BTW, I wonder if I put the penguins there because they are associated with chill, or if they are, as a consequence of the Google Penguin, a Freudian slip on my part.

Footnote:  Readers are encouraged to follow this blog on Twitter and LinkedIn and request regular newsletters by email.  Really nice followers can contact me, via LinkedIn, for some  free web design and SEO advice  (within reason …).


One thought on “Of Pandas, Penguins, and other Animals

  1. Pingback: What are quality links? « Blog Medic

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s